• Google is set to cut hundreds of new jobs in its device and platforms divisions soon.
  • The company has continued to cut its Google Pixel teams, doing so earlier this year as well.
  • Rival Microsoft is considering a new round of layoffs next month, per reports.
      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        As in we need to legitimize it via adopting payments & telling devs to put their apps here first (& possibly Federate these appstores)

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        i got the aurora store, after i heard about the android coree app that would appear.

        • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Is there anything that could make the installation routine in Aurora more stable?

          When there are updates for apps, I sometimes need to download them two or three times and the download or the installation afterwards doesn’t run through properly. It’s aborted too often. So updating several apps takes several attempts and a lot of time.

          Anyone else got this problem with Aurora?

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not like they have made anything with innovative with pixel anyways, other their obsession with using AI

    • Atmoro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Correction:

      Other than their obsession with using ai to surveillance & use that to control everyone in different ways

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        remember that android core app, that used to spy on people. nothing very useful.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      …good.

      The reason people use Pixels has always been utility. The Ai garbage was like putting jelly on a biscuit.

      I don’t mind the jelly, personally, but I came for the biscuit, and its still there.

      You can still root them, still unlock them, still use custom Roms, kernels, operating systems in some cases. They’re still what they’ve always been.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        people used pixels and nexus phones largely because the other oems were terrible at the time and riddled with carrier bloatware but that’s not really the case anymore. especially once samsung did away with touchwiz and went to the modern oneui.

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Samsung still is terrible. You can’t disable their store or utilities. They always pop right back up and start themselves. One might argue that’s hardly a problem when phones have 6GB+ of Ram now and better battery optimization, but on budget phones that some people get “free” from carriers, it makes them lag-ridden slogs to use.

    • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Their cameras and image processing tech were innovative at the beginning right? They were beating out most other phone manufacturers until they caught up. Also their folding phones seemed pretty innovative in regards to their form factor. Idk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        pixel has better camera than some other androids, but thats about it. theres very little difference between androids relatively speaking.

  • O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    10years ago I was told that if everyone from my graduating class across the USA went into computer science there still would be too many developer jobs to fill. I wish I could go back. With so many layoffs im competing with hundreds thousands for jobs, fml

    • Atmoro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Everyone needs to start creating Unionozed-cooperative businesses. Sharing the load that there can be more jobs. Not enough businesses being made

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Got told the same thing about systems administration 20 years ago. I struggled in my initial years. It’s just an upsell to get more people paying for school.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      10 years ago jobs for cs majors were pretty poor prospects already(as with all stem majors(, I think the Prof was out of touch. I was in a state school in West Coast,where a large percentage of students were cs, majors and the most common complaint is the jobs. This is from multiple forums, + in person experience. I had several people I know who had cs majors, job prospects are lacking,so they went to another state. Seems like they shouldve just got programming certifications instead, I’m not a techie. If their idea is to getting into development and research, like stem, it’s extremely difficult to get into.

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why would they need more staff if they plan on developing it in a closed source manner now?

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Android has always been developed in a closed-source manner by Google engineers, the recent changes only reduces the visibility of ongoing changes and the ability for developers outside of OEMs to contribute to Android (such contributions were already rare).

      This is explained further in this article:

      While some OS components, such as Android’s Bluetooth stack, are developed publicly in the AOSP branch, most components, including the core Android OS framework, are developed privately within Google’s internal branch. Google confirmed to Android Authority that it will soon shift all Android OS development to its internal branch, a change intended to streamline its development process.

      • Mike@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        the recent changes only reduces the visibility of ongoing changes and the ability for developers outside of OEMs to contribute to Android (such contributions were already rare).

        Why is this so underplayed as if it’s nearly meaningless though, is my question? A huge part of open source code is transparency, and this decision is a big blow to exactly that.

        Only posting the code when it’s finished increases the risk that it will not be correctly scrutinized in the way its been until now, not to mention the precedent this sets. Death of the OS in AOSP by a thousand shallow cuts is what I see here.

        • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          No one really scrutinized it while it was in development anyways. For example graphene os always looked at and made changes to the aosp releases.