You must log in or register to comment.
LMAO! Well, at least I can cry to Claude about it…
This is why I’m on Lemmy. You guys get me
This is 100% every normal person’s experience on there at one time or another. Having it be a dupe is perfect.
My boiled egg has to be just a little bit liquid on the inside 🌚
6 Minutes.Sticky =/= Liquid
🧐😜💦
Corrected.
❤️🔥
Downvote harder damnit! I think I broke my screen
That’s a stupid question it doesn’t deserve an answer. You should be ashamed you even thought about it.
Now, that’s the real SO experience.
I found a workaround for this:
I start with “a buggy LLM wrote this piece of code…” then i paste my code for review, so they can shit and bash on it “you’re absolutely right: that LLM done a disaster, this is a mess, look how inefficient is this function, here is how it can be improved…”
I shall try that. 🤔
SO: “that’s a stupid question!” GPT: “that’s a great question!”
stack overflow at least is polite enough to call you a moron for asking
ChatGPT is a narcissists dream app.
Well, if I asking for help, it’s probably because I am wrong about something. So I know who to trust.
piefed is working on solution and answer features and i can’t wait for stackoverflow like communities without the ai “enhancements”
This sounds pretty exciting and I keep hearing more and more about piefed lately. I’m kinda excited for this new burgeoning era of the federated 'Net!
Unfortunately aged like milk, StackOverflow was an early adopter of the LLM fad.
People on Social Media: “You absolutely are an asshole.”
^^^ Look at this absolute asshole!, ^^^
<— also this one
I usually combine both to unblock myself. Lately, SO, repository issues, or just going straight to the documentation of the package/crate seem to give me faster outcomes.
People have suggested that my prompts might not be optimal for the LLM. One even recommended I take a prompt engineering boot camp. I’m starting to think I’m too dumb to use LLMs to narrow my research sometimes. I’m fine with navigating SO toxicity, though it’s not much different from social media in general. It’s just how people are. You either take the best you can from it or let other people’s bad days affect yours.
They always accuse the user of being the problem when using glorified if-else machines.
LLMs have a bit of RNG sprinkled in with the if-else to spice things up.
Have some RNG in your garbage AI, as a treat.
If SO doesn’t have the answer to your question, LLMs won’t either. You can’t improve that by prompting “better”.
They are just an easier way to search for it. They don’t make answers up (or rather, they do, but when they do that, they are always wrong).
I’ve been having good luck with Kimi K2 for CSS/bootstrap stuff, and boilerplate API calls (example: update x to y, pulling x and y from this .csv). I appreciate that it cites its sources because then I can go read more and hopefully become more self-reliant when looking up documentation.
User: “Can I ask a q…”
Stackoverflow: “NO!”
Me: You fucking idiot.
it’s getting worse too.
Just this morning I asked claude a very basic question, it halucinated the answer 3 times in a row. zero correct solution. first answer It halucinated what a certain cli daemon does, second solution it provided an alternative that it literally halucinated, the thing didn’t exist at all, third solution it halucinated how another application works as well as the git repo for said application (A. doesn’t even do the the thing Claude describe and B. the repo it provided had NOTHING to do with the application it described) I just gave up and went to my searx and found the answer myself. I shouldn’t have been so lazy.
ChatGPT isn’t much better anymore.
I knew you write a function like this f(x) stack overflow has no idea what they are talking about.
two of the worst places to copy code from.
