With the UK apparently floating ideas of a VPN ban it’s got me worried about the future of anonymity online. Now people have already pointed out that a VPN ban doesn’t make sense because of all the legitimate uses of one and wouldn’t even be enforceable anyway, but that got me thinking.

What if governments ordered websites (such as social media sites) to block traffic originating from a VPN node? Lots of sites already do this (or restrict your activity if they detect a VPN) to mitigate spam etc. and technically that wouldn’t interfere with “legitimate” (in the eyes of the gov) VPN usage like logging onto corporate networks remotely

It’s already a pain with so many sites either blocking you from access or making you jump through a million captchas using VPNs now. I’m worried it’s about to get a whole lot worse

  • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I do exactly this, but it doesn’t protect your privacy. That one IP address is literally tied to your credit card number and you are the only person using it.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It takes lawful intercept by ISP out of the loop and the egress point should be in a minimally cooperative jurisdiction. You know the endpoint is known good since you’re the admin and the IP is not in a known VPN exit blocklist. Of course economically it makes sense to share tunnels with family and friends.