• Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    I had this issue with my last address, so when I moved to my current house and started seeing mail for the previous owner as well as what I assume to be the owner before him, I immediately wrote 'No longer at this address, return to sender" on all mail that wasn’t for me - even spam mail - and made a support ticket on the USPS website. I felt like it was a bit overkill, but I did stop seeing mail for other people pretty quickly.

    Dunno how quick Royal Mail would be comparatively, but maybe they’d be just as effective as USPS was for me.

    • Quicky@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      One year I did actually open one of the cards, but as predicted there was no return address, or even surname, so no chance of getting back to them.

      So as much as putting “No longer at this address” as has been suggested would probably stop me getting the cards, the senders would never know because the cards can’t be traced back.

      This way, those wishing the Jarvis’ season’s greetings year after year can continue to happily wish them well, oblivious to the fact that they lost touch over a decade ago.

      The Jarvis family probably have a different opinion though, and question why they never get Christmas cards from these people despite sending their own every year. Should have given them a forwarding address then shouldn’t you? Clearly you’re not that disappointed to lose touch if you couldn’t be arsed to update them, you boring-surnamed fucks. Merry Christmas.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ah, I didn’t realize return addresses weren’t mandatory in other parts of the world. I figured you just put yours elsewhere from ours on your letters when I saw the space where we usually have ours was blank. That certainly makes it difficult to resolve missent mail. I admire your ability to put a positive spin on the scenario, haha! I’m sure the senders are happier just continuing to believe their letters are being accepted and enjoyed.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Huh, you’re right. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a piece of mail without it - I just figured it was necessary.

            • Lemmington Bunnie@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              My mother certainly told me it was necessary as a child, but I think it was more in the “upholding the social contract” and “not being a lazy arse” sense of the word.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have you tried sending these back with “NO LONGER AT THIS ADDRESS” written clearly on both sides of the envelope?

    • Quicky@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      But what if the Jarvis family do still live here, and I just can’t see them? Maybe I’m a Jarvis? 😱