• :3 3: :3 3: :3 3: :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I have seen AI apologists talk about how “AI” is already sentient and we shouldn’t restrict it because it’s immoral.

    That straight up killed my desire to interact in that space the community with that person

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        No one who has even a vague understanding of present day ML models should not even entertain the idea that they are sentient, or thinking, or anything like it.

  • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m in the fourth camp of “I used to think I had zero artistic talent, and so I was really hyped for AI art to get good, but then I actually got half decent at art myself, and now I don’t want people to fall into this hole like I did because they think they’re too technical minded or it’s too late for them to learn art”, which may or may not just be the second camp.

    I acknowledge there are people who genuinely enjoy doing AI art, and I have seen some good creative stuff done with it. But I think there’s not enough focus on learning that art for yourself, and I side with the “soul creativity” camp on the argument that there is some aspect of human-made art that won’t ever be replicated by AI.