flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前systemd is all you needfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down110file-text
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imagesystemd is all you needfiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square124linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebricked@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·1 年前I thought the same, but didn’t we already have things like chron syntax for this? Systemd didn’t have to build its own library.
minus-squareTakios@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·1 年前Systemd’s method is more powerful than Cron syntax.
minus-squarebricked@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 年前Aight, didn’t know that. I cannot yet imagine any scheduled task that would require anything more advanced than cron (or a similar standalone syntax), but I’ll just trust you with that one.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Can you tell Cron to catch up on the things that should’ve happened but didn’t because the system was off?
I thought the same, but didn’t we already have things like chron syntax for this? Systemd didn’t have to build its own library.
Systemd’s method is more powerful than Cron syntax.
Aight, didn’t know that. I cannot yet imagine any scheduled task that would require anything more advanced than cron (or a similar standalone syntax), but I’ll just trust you with that one.
Can you tell Cron to catch up on the things that should’ve happened but didn’t because the system was off?