Home | PETI | Committees | European Parliament
www.europarl.europa.eu
Main page of the Petitions Portal. General information, most recently uploaded petitions and further links to procedural pages. Further links to the European Parliament website.

Petition Summary: The petitioner calls for the European Union to actively develop and implement a Linux-based operating system, termed ‘EU-Linux’, across public administrations in all EU Member States. This initiative aims to reduce dependency on Microsoft products, ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and promoting transparency, sustainability, and digital sovereignty within the EU. The petitioner emphasizes the importance of using open-source alternatives to Microsoft 365, such as LibreOffice and Nextcloud, and suggests the adoption of the E/OS mobile operating system for government devices. The petitioner also highlights the potential for job creation in the IT sector through this initiative.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    10·
    3 hours ago

    Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

    Then focus on enforcing FOSS software in public services but don’t bother with a “european linux distro”, that’s just a waste of resources. There are already a great deal of distros around. Considering geopolitics i’d go with SuSe or some other EU-based distro.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      92·
      3 hours ago

      Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

      That’s an impossible task. Not even Microsoft manages that. Do not want to count how often i used libreOffice to repair or convert an older MSOffice file so it can be opend with modern Versions of MSOffice.

      Once there was a 500MB Excel Sheet with lime 500-1000 used Cells, opened and saved it to.a xlsx file using libreOffice and reduced it to a few MB while still being fully functional.

      • ⁂ jnk :InfinityVerified:@masto.es
        6·
        2 hours ago

        @ShortN0te @0x0 I mean the real problem here is that MS office is a mess but somehow still standardized, so “enforcing standards” would be as easy as showing MS the middle finger and using libre office. They’d save a lot of money and time, it’s a clear win-win scenario imho

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          6·
          2 hours ago

          Open standards are the first step of a functional transition to an open government. From there Open Source Software can compete against commercial software, once the ppl see that the FOSS offers the same features then the proprietary paid software they can easily switch to it. With open standards they only need to train the users, no data to migrate etc.

    • Handles@leminal.spaceEnglish
      4·
      3 hours ago

      Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance

      For sure, but ¿por qué no los dos?

      Completely agree with your other prioritisations.