kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 days agoI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1607arrow-down14
arrow-up1603arrow-down1imageI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlkingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareAtlusb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44·17 days agoYes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
minus-squarealcoholicorn@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·17 days agoWhich policy though? He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
minus-squareNanook@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·17 days ago“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
minus-squarekautau@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agoshhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
…you don’t say?
Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
Which policy though?
He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
Gorilla policy
“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures