Those non-violent protests shook them so bad they wanted to charge non-violent Quaker protestors with terrorism.

    • yarr@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What change was accomplished by OccupyWallstreet?

      They were angry about economic inequality – it’s worse today than in 2011.

      They wanted an end to corporate personhood – still totally cookin’ in 2024 with no end in sight

      More regulation of the financial sector – we are more deregulated than ever today

      I had to admire their aims, but as a movement it was profoundly ineffective…

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think it absolutely laid down the base for the modern progressive movement - mistakenly believing protests do anything on their own

        Occupy was huge, it was global and persisted for a long time, but it didn’t have any teeth - people just stopped paying attention and eventually police cleared people out

        No one (rich) was losing money, no one (rich) felt threatened or inconvenienced in any way. They made their feelings known… But most people had no idea why or what they wanted, and politicians don’t actually care what you want. They didn’t even organize enough to be a voting block or clearly communicate their message