• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This seems as unlikely to be true, as it does sensationalist. Hate on Bitcoin all ya like, but don’t make off the cuff “calculations” and report it as news.

  • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Crypto is entirely an extremely expensive gambling system. It serves no actual explainable purpose for the vast majority of people. It’s trivially provable to be worse than existing alternatives in every way that isn’t scams and or money laundering.

  • Tigbitties@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You know what else uses as much water as a swimming pool? Swimming pools.

    And don’t get me started on golf courses.

    • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t get me started on humans either. Not only do those thirsty shits require shitloads of water to function, it also needs to be clean! Not relatively clean either, but clean clean!

      Do you have any idea how many bitcoin farms I could run if there weren’t any humans? Me neither, but it’s probably zero.

  • sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is simply untrue. I know a large BTC mining operation and they don’t use water. They use the gases coming off from oil mining that would otherwise go into the atmosphere. BTC mining takes advantage of surplus energy so it’s creation doesn’t go to waste. The mining is good for our environment. I’ve also read about solar panels sitting above crops to power BTC miners. These panels covering the crops help conserve water while helping the plants grow better.

    Edit: • Agrivoltaic farmingMining with gas flaringMining with nuclear and hydro power

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Eth consistently seems to be the better technology. I really don’t see why Bitcoin doesn’t see more transition from mining to just validation as it sunsets.

    • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mining is validation through POW. Eth is almost pointless from the point of view of bitcoin as proof of stake is “who has the gold makes the rules”.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        PoW is inherently unavailable while also a system of dimmishing returns. PoS is bad IMHO too, but from a sociopolitical aspect and not from tech standpoint.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, yeah, it’s bad. We shouldn’t be ignoring how bad bitcoin is for the environment.

    But are you really gonna tell me that all the computers and CPU time that Wall Street uses for trading somehow takes less?

    It doesn’t matter what financial system you use, you’re still burning energy to make it work.