hey nerds, I’m getting myself a new personal laptop as a treat, but I very much do not want windows 11 shitting it up. Is there a linux distro with caveman-compatible instructions for installation and use? I want to think about my OS as little as possible while actually using it.

I’ve got one friend who uses mint, but I’ve also seen memes dunking on it so who knows. I actually really only know what I’ve seen from you all shitposting in other communities

  • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s hilarious how uncool it is to suggest Ubuntu but it often just works, including very recent hardware if it’s from Canonical partners like Lenovo or Dell. And the kerfuffle about things like snaps are way overblown.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I came here to say this as well. Ubuntu “just works”™ and was my entry into linux 15+ years ago.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Ubuntu was my entry to linux as well, 19 years ago. But Ubuntu of today is not the Ubuntu of 15-19 years ago, and not in a good way.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fedora tends to “just work” too. Some manufacturers that support Ubuntu also support Fedora for customers that need a “RedHat-ish” distro instead of a “Debian-ish” one.

    • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      you’re right, but the issues with ubuntu crop up later, when you have to update or after you install enough incompatible stuff that it breaks your system. which is a shame bc ubuntu is the most user friendly distro there is imo

      • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t recognize this myself. I’ve never had trouble with incompatibilities or degradation etc.,

        Especially these days my OS can remain very vanilla, as many complex things can be containerized. E.g. I run syncthing and an nfs server and sometimes torrenting over vpn, through docker-compose; I’d never install all that on the host with all the extensive dependencies. Same with some heavyweight apps like darktable - spin them up from Flatpak.

        Ubuntu does it very well with minimal fuss. I see little to dislike.

        • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          my last personal anectode with ubuntu is this: my company decided to setup our office as a remote-onsite hybrid workplace, so our working machines were moved to a rack elsewhere to be accessed remotely and the local machines were supposed to act as basically dumb terminals that can be used interchangeably by us

          we develop on rhel, but since the local machines are just to access our dev machines remotely, support decided to install ubuntu because it “just works”. turns out, since ubuntu does a lot of stuff its own way for no good reason, it broke under our network configuration (it’s complicated) and no snap application could run – so, no slack or firefox. not a great scenario for a workplace. in the end we decided to replace ubuntu by rhel and no longer had any issues

          you’re right that ubuntu might work flawlessly for you and that it might never break. but, it also might break in unexpected ways. i cannot reliably recommend ubuntu to a beginner because this risk might forever put someone off of linux

        • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is it though? I’ve found it rock solid for years on end - been using it for 14 years, and Debian before that.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            i mean idk, i was just asking about what that other poster was saying. i fuckin’ hate ubuntu for other reasons and i generally don’t speak on it in the negative or positive in threads like this. i only chimed in because what was being said struck me as odd. “it’s the most user friendly distro there is, it just breaks a lot”

            it made me wonder what user friendly meant to this other user. i wanted to hear their perspective because i thought i could learn something, especially as i help my mom, an inexperienced linux user, use linux on an old laptop for the first time

        • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          i mean… when it doesn’t break, it works better than anything else. 5-minute installs, supports a ton of configurations and peripherals out of the box, makes gnome a little more usable, etc, etc

          …but it breaks, eventually

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      More specifically Ubuntu LTS, since interim releases are now expectedly beta quality and require upgrades a few months after release. Ubuntu LTS, enable unattended upgrades, register and activate Ubuntu Pro for them and you won’t have to touch it for the lifetime of the hardware.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially because it’s to a newbie, who stands to benefit the most from using an OS with more user share and more available online resources.