• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    17 days ago

    Just replace the CEO with an AI. It would probably do the job just as poorly, but wouldn’t need any payment.

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      The only problem with that is it would perform logical actions that do not generate immediate short term profits. It might end up implementing 4 day work weeks and remote work, which are proven to increase productivity.

      • lurklurk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 days ago

        Or it would hallucinate and do weird shit, or get easily manipulated by someone

        What people are calling AI in this bubble is just a mindless text generator

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Nvidia is really enjoying having inconceivable amounts of money. I don’t have any confidence that a C suite ai wouldn’t cost companies similar amounts of money as the people they replace.

  • ebolapie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    17 days ago

    I asked an LLM to translate the idea into corporate jargon (it turns out this is something they’re actually quite good at) and it spat this out:

    Office-Safe Jargon: "Executive compensation levels may warrant further evaluation in light of current financial performance. A potential avenue for optimizing resource allocation could involve a modest reduction in executive remuneration, which may contribute positively to overall profitability.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    Not to excuse the relentless flow of money upward, but the two times we had to do (temporary) pay cuts in my career, it was 10-15% for employees, paid back eventually, and 35-50% for executives, not repaid. At two different companies. So I do know at least sometimes it’s done that way.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’ll just just repeat this here. I am a US laborer. I got two days paid time off last year, and when I brought it up, my boss suggested saving them for an emergency. I got an email January 1 that they disappeared.

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Damn that sucks. In the UK a full time employee gets a minimum of 28 days off a year, and you’ll probably be encouraged to at least tell the company how you’ll use them before the end of the financial year, depending on how the company does time off.

        • MNByChoice@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Advice for others reading this:

          • know the vacation policy.
          • do days carry over to next year?
          • what happens if you go over. (Sometimes one is fired, othertimes one only looses a day of pay don’t get paid for that day.)

          Edit: clarification