• arbitrary_sarcasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don’t take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.

    • ramirezmike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      they can’t really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can’t just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Not really. It’s just a fancy forum.

        Social network platforms have corporate controlled algorithms designed to maximize addiction. At the very least, you would need a “friend” system and who the fuck follows each other on here? When I was using reddit, one person followed me and it was a bot.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        One where you can use any server and client you wish, as long as it implements the same freely-available spec. You can probably access the source code of the server and client you’re using.

        As with many things: the problem is not the technology itself, but the terms that capital owners demand we accept in order to use it.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        As if the US government could understand this platform. It will be a shame to lose lemmy.world though

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    “lobbing”

    is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha

  • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users

  • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If Zuck gives Trump more money then why would he? Probably would just allow Meta to buy it or something dumb like that.

    • sil@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trumps just gonna keep him hanging hoping he’s in the inner circle and bleeding him dry in the process.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why does everyone think Trumps going to allow Tiktok. He doesn’t like China, and Musk is going to push him to ban it so he can buy it.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        4 days ago

        ByteDance has a lot of money. Trump likes money. Trump’s only leverage over ByteDance is allowing TikTok, so he’ll do that in exchange for money

        Zuckerberg and Meta are much more centralized in the US, which gives Trump far more options in terms of what he can offer them. Trump will give Zuckerberg something else to placate him. Probably lots of cheap H-1B labor

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          If you haven’t noticed Trump says a lot of things. He’s always talking out of both sides of his mouth. I’ll believe it when I see it, we’ll see tomorrow. Also, a delay is not overturning it.

      • suigenerix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re partially right. Trump originally wanted to ban TikTok because “China.”

        However, the platform’s influence on younger voters supposedly helped him to win the election, so he now favors it.

        No surprise that Trump’s personal needs are far more important than real US security.

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta’s disclosure

    Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it’s really depressing to see

    Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, companies hiring people in politics or with government connections is a very normal thing

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Stifling competition, great use indeed. Make today’s billionaires trillionaires.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        TikTok are not competition, they don’t even care about profit or they would have sold 80% of ownership and would continue operating legally.

        They’re a weapon

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The same can be said for Meta and X. They even stopped moderating them. So why shall we ban TikTok and allow Meta and X to continue working? I am up for greater scrutiny of social media, but one that’s applied equally across all platforms.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            When Meta sold data to Russia via Cambridge Analytica they recieved the largest FTC fine in history, and that was long before the law was even conceived.

            If the platforms did it today then they should face the full consequences the same as TikTok.

            • filister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              And where is the proof that something similar has happened? Didn’t TikTok comply with every request of the US government?

              And what about the lack of fact checking on Meta and X. Isn’t this a concern for you that they will spread misinformation even faster now? Where are their fines?

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Didn’t TikTok comply with every request of the US government?

                No. The requirements are listed in H.R. 816 Divisions H and Division I.

                TikTok knows they didn’t comply with them because they made a show of shutting down. TikTok servers are centralized in Beijing.