Came across this article and it got me thinking, are there any simple ways to defeat advanced tracking methods (fingerprinting, tracking pixels, etc.)?

Obviously you could go the Tor on a virtual machine route, or a non persistent set up like TAILS, but what about a browser that’s able to give say, a 80% solution?

I work in the security industry and am always looking for the solution that is simple enough that its palatable to a client (not asking to change your whole lifestyle, just push this button) but also relatively effective.

  • Kayel@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Google:

    They’ve been asking us not to track them with cookies, so we’re tracking them with fingerprints

    Surely the gdpr has something to say about this. Or did the US forget the rest of the wold exists again?

    • Meshuggah333@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t give a F about any one and any laws as long as they get away with it. That’s late stage capitalism for you.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Any country trying to protect itself from US big tech gets threatened by tariffs, of course

        That is way you go up that orange ass

    • CoffeeRam@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly, Google even advocated against the use of more intrusive tracking technology like fingerprinting stating it was too intrusive, I’ll be the first to say I’m pro capitalist (if you can work hard and get rich, power to you), but when you are willing to invade the literal physical privacy of people who do not even want your products, it calls into question the legitimacy of your company.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am also pro being able to form your own future by giving an extra hand to the world.

        I do however disagree on the part where you have to be born into certain privileges to be able to do this. Yes, giving extra should mean you get extra but all in accordance to individual abilities an privilege. Someone born rich should have it significantly harder to make more than someone born poor for example.

      • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I appreciate that you are standing for moral dignities like personal privacy. But understand, Google’s entire business model IS surveillance capitalism.

        Profits aren’t infinite if the resource is finite. Eventually, they would have to dig the mineshaft deeper, take more material to sell more product. This is what happens when capital is left laissez-faire, it grows more tentacles.

        • Zeroc00l@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Exactly, and we wouldn’t want people with different opinions, experiences or mindsets on this website would we.