• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Doubtful. TOS would state that you’re only licensing the media. If the media no longer exists, the license no longer exists.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Day 10,490 of saying it should be flatly illegal to call a lease a purchase. Companies should never be allowed to use language that implies ownership of a product when what you’re buying is a permanently revokable temporary lease.

        “But it’s in the TOS, what they’re doing is perfectly legal” yeah the problem is that it’s legal

      • bort@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fraud is still fraud, even if they call it something else.

        The consumer was led to believe, they could access the media for a long time. The time was abruptly cut short. The consumer did not get what they were led to believe. It’s fraud.

        It’s like every other (consumer-)fraud before: they can write in the fine print whatever they want.


        I am not saying that this argument will definitely hold up in court. I just want to point out, that it’s not so clear-cut as you are presenting it.