What alternatives do people have to monetize software in a more ethical way?

I particularly don’t understand the funding that some software receive. What they have to grant to receive those funds?

I also search for some type of monetization “model” better than donations, but more ethical than ads.

If it’s too much to explain I would be grateful for terms or books that I could search later.

    • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cloud services or features monetization are interesting, I’ve seen some companies do a community or a local version and the business version with more features.

      • *dust.sys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        The slippery slope that projects taking this approach fall into boils down to ‘let’s put all our new features behind a business version and never add them to the community version until they become 2 totally different code bases’

        • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          What about a modular software, a base version and the modules are paid ? It would maybe avoid ramification? And the user would have more freedom.

        • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I always imagined some sort of IP royalty, like you have an idea and implement it, then if someone build something over it for profit they need to pay a fixed percentage otherwise it would be free to use basically.

    • LumpyPancakes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds a bit like Rustdesk. I’m happily hosting a relay on my VPS but the ‘account’ features don’t work for the free version. I just keep them in a note instead.