Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agoReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1857arrow-down149
arrow-up1808arrow-down1imageReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down2·9 days agoWrong dude. That was Abraham in Genesis.
minus-squareCalipherJones@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up55arrow-down4·9 days agoIf Jesus is God and God told Abraham then i guess it’s technically the right dude.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up52arrow-down1·9 days agoonly jesus said there is a new covenant with him, which nearly all denominations interpret to mean the rite of circumcision is a thing of the past
minus-squaredontbelasagne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoDidn’t Jesus deny being god though, the son of god and god are not the same entity, it’s like saying I’m my mother because I was born out of her, but two different entities
minus-squarePippipartner@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoThis is technical correct and I love it.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·9 days agoJesus hadn’t been created yet. God is eternal, but Jesus was God made mortal.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days ago In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him: and without him was made nothing that was made." is generally interpreted to mean that Jesus was there from the beginning. Or, to quote the Nicene Creed, begotten and not made, consubstantial with the Father
minus-square4am@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 days agoNot as readily recognizable; but on the other hand, if you recognize Jesus then you already know this is incorrect. Where’s that painting of Moses with the tablets? That’s probably better
minus-squareBastingChemina@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoYes, this dude got his dick cut off as well.
Wrong dude. That was Abraham in Genesis.
If Jesus is God and God told Abraham then i guess it’s technically the right dude.
only jesus said there is a new covenant with him, which nearly all denominations interpret to mean the rite of circumcision is a thing of the past
Didn’t Jesus deny being god though, the son of god and god are not the same entity, it’s like saying I’m my mother because I was born out of her, but two different entities
This is technical correct and I love it.
Jesus hadn’t been created yet. God is eternal, but Jesus was God made mortal.
is generally interpreted to mean that Jesus was there from the beginning. Or, to quote the Nicene Creed,
Not as readily recognizable; but on the other hand, if you recognize Jesus then you already know this is incorrect.
Where’s that painting of Moses with the tablets? That’s probably better
Yes, this dude got his dick cut off as well.