return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoAudible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square161linkfedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down118
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkAudible unveils plans to use AI voices to narrate audiobookswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square161linkfedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-27 months agoYep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being." (edit: the original book copyright would still apply however… So would only be public domain if the book itself was also public domain)
minus-squareJhex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agofree AI read audiobooks coming up
minus-squareThreeme2189@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoHow about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data? Does that circumvent the copyright?
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoDuno, probably to some extent, similarly to how remixes of music sometimes have to pay royalties to the source of the sample if it’s recognisable…? Actually would probably be more similar to the George Carlin AI impersonation lawsuit , but they settled, so idk.
Yep, copyright doesn’t apply to AI generated content.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/#%3A~%3Atext=U.S.+Circuit+Judge+Patricia+Millett+wrote+for%2Cthe+first+instance+by+a+human+being."
(edit: the original book copyright would still apply however… So would only be public domain if the book itself was also public domain)
free AI read audiobooks coming up
How about I spin up an AI model that outputs a near 1:1 copy of the training data?
Does that circumvent the copyright?
Duno, probably to some extent, similarly to how remixes of music sometimes have to pay royalties to the source of the sample if it’s recognisable…?
Actually would probably be more similar to the George Carlin AI impersonation lawsuit , but they settled, so idk.