Why isn’t this a popular thing?

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not very convenient if a date change happens during your typical workday and that your meeting is from Monday 23:00 o’clock until Tuesday 1:00 o’clock. I mean, sure, we could deal with it, but locally it only adds new complexity.

        Sure, you could talk with anyone in the world and agree on a time without misunderstandings, but as soon as you want to know if people in the other country are even awake at that time, or if it’s during business hours, you need to do the same calculations as before and need to look up how many hours the schedule is shifted in that country, similar to before.

        My Anki deck (flashcards app) would like to know when it’s the next day. It now uses a standard (configurable) value worldwide (4:00 o’clock, to allow for late nights). If we used UTC everywhere, a standard value wouldn’t make any sense, and you would have to know the local offset, and change it when you are traveling.

        Taking about traveling: instead of just changing the time zone on your devices and be done with it, you need to look up what time you should go to sleep and wake up and at what time the stores open to fit the local schedule and none of the hours that you’re used to would make any sense. Let’s have dinner at 19:00 o’clock. No, wait, that’s in the early morning here.

        We already have UTC as a standard reference, and we don’t need to adopt it for local time, as long as the offset is clear when communicating across borders. Digital calendars already take time zones into account, so when I’m inviting people from overseas, they know at what time in their local timezone the meeting starts.

        The issue is not the time zones, but the fact that we live on a sphere revolving around a star and that our biological system likes to be awake when it’s light outside.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is exactly right. People don’t wan to change, even if the new way is demonstrably superior. Look at the adoption of the Metric system in England and the (almost) adoption in the US.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        and the (almost) adoption in the US.

        For example:

        • 1 bushel is exactly 64 dry pints.

        • 1 dry pint is exactly 107521/92400 liquid pints.

        • 1 liquid pint is exactly 231/8 cubic inches.

        • We formally defined the inch in terms of the metric system in the 1950s as being precisely 2.54 centimeters.

        Thus making the bushel exactly 220244188543/6250000 cubic centimeters.¹

        ¹ Unless you’re talking about an oat bushel, a barley bushel, a wheat bushel, or a few other exceptions.

        • MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Well, that is neat. When using metric and celsius:

          • 1 kilometer is 1.000 meters.
          • 1 square meter of water weighs exactly 1 tonne. (1.000 kilo also known as a kilokilo)
          • The vastly superior metric dozen is exactly 10.
          • Water freezes at exactly 0 degrees.
          • 1 meter of water takes exactly 100 minutes - a metric hour - to completely evaporate when heated to 100 degrees. Doing so requires exactly 1 kilowatt of power.