I started to notice some thing weird while using Reddit, every link post from Condé Nast owned news outlet was getting a high amount of upvotes and awards while other publications had a very normal rate of awards( usually zero, with the exception of the sponsored ones) and upvotes.

That when I started to investigate this matter till I found out about this.

They are boosting their publications on Reddit on the major subreddits. They are trying to give their publications a advantage over all the other news outlets.

They have the ability to kill the other news outlets if they keep doing that. Avoid them as if your freedom is dependent on it.

  • Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    267
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ars Technica has always been very upfront about it whenever they cover news related to reddit. It’s certainly not ideal, but Ars Technica remains a very good website for tech news

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      Ars Technica is generally excellent in my experience, one of the better tech news websites.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          TechDirt for stuff that has more to do with the legal side, rather than technical news

          TheRegister for general computer news with a dash of bri’ish sarcasm

      • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Agreed. As long as their corporate overlords do not fuck up Ars, there is no reason to avoid them.

        If (when ?) it becomes an AI slop-filled shell of its former self, then it will be past time to go elsewhere.

    • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yup, as long as the current staff (by and large) are still at the helm of the Ars orbiting HQ, I’ll continue to go there. I’ve lost too many other good tech news sites in the last decade, I can’t lose another one.

      The rest of Conde Nast is hot garbage.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      but Ars Technica remains a very good website for tech news

      This thread imply they are not a very good website for tech news.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Somehow, they actually are a good source for political news. The tech press (them and Wired) have been some of the best at covering the second Trump Admin. Possibly because it’s crawling in tech bros, and the tech press already knows how to deal with them.

        • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Somehow, they actually are a good source for political news.

          This thread imply they are not a very good website for tech news and neither political.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah, the conde owner bit isn’t news to anyone, just cause this one guy never looked. Are is fine and it will be as long as the current people are there. Until it gets looted and the staff laid off it is fine. Eric Berger navigates a bit of a tightrope because he has high level access to Musk but can’t be too direct about asking anything other than rockets, even though the political part is affecting the space part a lot right now. I do expect that just like Polygon it will eventually be gutted but nothing lasts forever.