• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    5 months ago

    tl;dr: “digital sovereignty”. “EU leaders are seeking to reduce Europe’s dependence on foreign technology providers, primarily those from the United States, and to assert greater control over its digital infrastructure, data, and technological future.”

    Fair enough and makes sense. Every country should be trying to be as independant as possible IMO.

    • TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We only need that independence because we can’t trust each other. There’s no problem in some countries being more focused on one thing or another, as long as we are collaborating with each other without taking advantage of anyone. Unfortunately, there are still dangerous players in the world and we have to be prepared to defend against them and this capitalistic view we currently have guarantees that there’s always someone taking advantage of someone else.

      We need to evolve…

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      15 years ago this statement would lead to accusations of being anti-globalist, communist, economically illiterate.

      15 years ago this made economical (just not political) sense and was the right approach.

      Now it still is, but there’s an additional quality - I think the incentive is not of public good, it’s of strengthening authoritarianism on both sides of the Atlantic ocean. Domestic authoritarians always want to play with their toys without foreign authoritarians meddling. But if the domestic environment is not authoritarian, only foreign is, then they are not in conflict, and the other way around too.

      So this may mean that both USA and EU are changing for the worse, for now.

      Not attacking Linux or LibreOffice.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would argue that switching to an open-source model for all your tools is more globalist. Open source projects are being maintained by people all over the world, and any group or branch is allowed to modify and redistribute their personal version of any project.

        It’s the opposite of being subject to an ever growing corporation you can’t even put checks on. Every government using the product of a single small group of massively rich corporations is giving said corporation unprecedented power over the world.