• LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I figured this would come up but you’ve gotta remember that drugs are expensive as hell to develop. And it just received US approval in June so it’s not like they have been sitting on this making money for years.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The cost of drug development is vastly overstated as an excuse. The reality is $100-200M, but pharma expects $14B++ in returns. Little of that goes back into basic research.

      The front end of costs was spent by the NIH, and after that was ended, Pharma is not taking up the slack. It’s not sustainable and pharma will die in a decade.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, a lot of these drug companies have ad budgets larger than the R&D budget, but any overhead is used to jack up the prices. I swear ads are sold at inflated prices for the sake of being able to sell high.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’d like to see some sources on those numbers, I couldn’t find any of that when I searched.