Timothy Murray lost his father earlier this year and had been asking his principal for counseling when she called in the police

  • jasory@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because denying an action is simply requiring that the existing circumstance continue, while forcing an action is to require that the person engage in a conscious action (to specify, it’s a stronger control over someone else’s body).

    “Do you consider a fertilised egg to have the same moral weight as a person”

    I already answered this more generally, fertilisation is not the revelant part it is that it is a distinct organism with a reasonable expectation of future conscious experience. Many fertilised eggs do meet this standard, but not all. Likewise fertilised eggs are not the only things that meet this standard. Things like pluripotent stem cells that are being created to form fetuses, also meet this standard.

    (I strongly suspect that you are fishing for a specific response, which you find absurd despite ultimately accepting all the premises.)

    • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I strongly suspect that you are fishing for a specific response, which you find absurd despite ultimately accepting all the premises.

      I’m not. I thought you were pretty clear, but I wanted to check. I’m sort of exploring what you believe, rather than fishing for anything in particular.

      So, in your view, if a building were burning, and inside was an artificial womb of some sort with twenty viable eggs that will eventually become people, then would there be a moral duty to save them over one five-year-old child?

      presupposing that bodily autonomy is morally relevant

      Do you believe that it isn’t?