• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    15 days ago

    I think a substantial part of the problem is the employee turnover rates in the industry. It seems to be just accepted that everyone is going to jump to another company every couple years (usually due to companies not giving adequate raises). This leads to a situation where, consciously or subconsciously, noone really gives a shit about the product. Everyone does their job (and only their job, not a hint of anything extra), but they’re not going to take on major long term projects, because they’re already one foot out the door, looking for the next job. Shitty middle management of course drastically exacerbates the issue.

    I think that’s why there’s a lot of open source software that’s better than the corporate stuff. Half the time it’s just one person working on it, but they actually give a shit.

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Definitely part of it. The other part is soooo many companies hire shit idiots out of college. Sure, they have a degree, but they’ve barely understood the concept of deep logic for four years in many cases, and virtually zero experience with ANY major framework or library.

      Then, dumb management puts them on tasks they’re not qualified for, add on that Agile development means “don’t solve any problem you don’t have to” for some fools, and… the result is the entire industry becomes full of functionally idiots.

      It’s the same problem with late-stage capitalism… Executives focus on money over longevity and the economy becomes way more tumultuous. The industry focuses way too hard on “move fast and break things” than making quality, and … here we are, discussing how the industry has become shit.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        My hot take : lots of projects would benefit from a traditional project management cycle instead of trying to force Agile on every projects.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Agile SHOULD have a lot of the things ‘traditional’ management looks for! Though so many, including many college teachers I’ve heard, think of it way too strictly.

          It’s just the time scale shrinks as necessary for specific deliverable goals instead of the whole product… instead of having a design for the whole thing from top to bottom, you start with a good overview and implement general arch to service what load you’ll need. Then you break down the tasks, and solve the problems more and more and yadda yadda…

          IMO, the people that think Agile Development means only implement the bare minimum … are part of the complete fucking idiot portion of the industry.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            Agile was the cool new thing years back and has been abused and misused and now, pretty much every dev company force it on their team but do whatever the fuck they want.

            Agile should have a lot of traditional project management but doesn’t because it became the MBA wet dream of metrics. And when metrics become the target, people will do whatever they need to do to meet the metrics instead of actually progressing the project.

            • MotoAsh@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Yep! Funny how so many good ideas get ruined by the people that think they deserve the biggest pay checks…

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        That’s “disrupting the industry” or “revolutionizing the way we do things” these days. The “move fast and break things” slogan has too much of a stink to it now.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Probably because all the dummies are finally realizing it’s a fucking stupid slogan that’s constantly being misinterpreted from what it’s supposed to mean. lol (as if the dummies even realize it has a more logical interpretation…)

          Now if only they would complete the maturation process and realize all of the tech bro bullshit runs counter to good engineering or business…

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      True, but this is a reaction to companies discarding their employees at the drop of a hat, and only for “increasing YoY profit”.

      It is a defense mechanism that has now become cultural in a huge amount of countries.