• RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pretty cool. I tried to google it, and I couldn’t actually find the source for it. Just a bunch of articles about it and a reddit thread.

    I’m curious what it’s written in

  • yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Too bad the front isn’t a screen too. It would be pretty awesome to open a book and automatically slave the front screen to the book’s cover.

    Also strange that the dev didn’t enable wifi. That’s just strange. It’s running an esp32, it has a wifi chip and getting it to connect is incredibly easy.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Probably don’t want the burden of keeping the firmware up-to-date with the latest security fixes, and miminizes the risk of a security exploit if that door isn’t opened.

      • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I haven’t. More than anything I’m supporting the idea of something like this. Little clamshell ereader that’s not tied to a company? Hell yeah. Version 0.01 here might not be what I’m lusting after, but it’s that much closer to Version 2.0.

        • FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess I’m too much of a “if you’re gonna do something, then do it right the first time” kinda person. I’ve learned from (too much) experience that compromises on quality too often just wind up being wasted money.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Pine64 tried that with their PineNote, which hardware wise seems excellent. But it ended up being so expensive that sales were abmyssal and subsequently there was also little developer take up and general community excitement to make something cool out of it on the software side.

            • FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s pretty common. Final cost will always matter, but the product still has to be worth it. Many companies have a history of not making the best balance calls, however.

              One thing I’ve learned never to scrimp too much on, however, is anything i directly interact with. Displays are especially important for the health of your eyes - especially with as much time as most people spend looking at them nowadays. As such, I can’t really get behind this product.

          • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Well the problem here is that there isn’t a company that have money and so they can’t do a very good product, when the project will gain money they can do a V2 with better specs and in general they will know better how build it, this prosuct is pre-launch and in general you have to see those as betas not a end product.

            Also, e-ink displays cost more than my balls

          • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I can dig that. Just like how I have no intention of building / buying this model, but the progress towards something I’ve been pining for is exciting.

      • RonSijm@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it’s “open source hardware” wouldn’t it be pretty easy to put it different screens?

        Like it also only had a 2 GB SD card… I’d guess most people would upgrade that