حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoRisklemmy.mlimagemessage-square165linkfedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down115
arrow-up183arrow-down1imageRisklemmy.mlحمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square165linkfedilink
minus-squareSippyCup@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoReverse italics would work so well. However I feel like to be truly good sarcasm, it needs to fly over someone’s head.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoSarcasm doesn’t need to decieve, it needs to make a point IMO.
minus-squareWhostosay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoMaking it obvious with a /s or similar takes a away from that I feel
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months ago/s doesn’t take away from the point, it’s just an indicator. In this day and age, it’s legitimately impossible to tell otherwise sometimes.
minus-squareagnomeunknown@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoI’ve always been a fan of using an asterisk, which I refer to as starcasm
Reverse italics would work so well.
However I feel like to be truly good sarcasm, it needs to fly over someone’s head.
Sarcasm doesn’t need to decieve, it needs to make a point IMO.
Making it obvious with a /s or similar takes a away from that I feel
/s doesn’t take away from the point, it’s just an indicator. In this day and age, it’s legitimately impossible to tell otherwise sometimes.
I’ve always been a fan of using an asterisk, which I refer to as starcasm
That works too!