• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    From my limited understanding, the PS3’s architecture is actually very different from PCs and modern consoles. From a developer’s perspective, it was very different to make games for it, its capabilities and strengths and weaknesses were just different. So it’s no surprise that its games have a certain look and feel to them.

    The PS4 and later, OTOH, is a more standard PC architecture which means iterative improvements and less difference between generations.

    Disclaimer: didn’t fact-check any of this, would appreciate replies correcting mistakes

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think you might be one generation ahead. I remember the PS3 being touted as a computer in its own right, and stories about people installing Linux on it.

      But I could be wrong.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It was marketed for PS2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_for_PlayStation_2

        The PS3 could run Linux initially, but Sony remotely disabled it on account of being a shower of cunts, resulting in a bunch of lawsuits (which even more cuntingly they paid out on, sooner than re-enable Linux).

        That said I think you may be talking slightly at cross purposes; the ability to run Linux isn’t tied to processor architecture, and doesn’t mean anything in terms of what the PS3 was like to develop for as a professional game studio.