A recent interview session between Twitch streamers and content creators saw Sandfall Interactive's Guillaume Broche clarifying the studio's AI usage

The gaming world appeared ablaze after the Indie Game Awards announced that it was rescinding the top honors awarded to RPG darling Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 due to the use of generative AI during development. Sandfall Interactive recently sat down with a group of influencers for a private interview session, where the French studio was probed about recent AI controversies. Game director Guillaume Broche clarified some of the misinformation surrounding the studio and reiterated what other Sandfall developers have said about generative AI usage during interviews held earlier in the year.

Transcription of the Q&A comes courtesy of gaming content creator Sushi, who was one of the handful of influencers who were present at the session. Twitch streamer crizco prefaced his question by recounting the storm surrounding Baldur’s Gate 3 developer Larian Studios’ admission about using generative AI during game development.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2411·
      3 months ago

      No AI in video games, period. We’ve learned when we draw the line the major players push at it until they get what they want. AI benefits the wealthy, no one else. AI data centers are a blight on communities.

      • zbyte64@awful.systemsEnglish
        94·
        3 months ago

        But maybe if I use AI I can be wealthy. Sure it is accelerating climate change and will undoubtedly cost lives, but that is a small price to pay for me to horde money like a dragon.

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          41·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think the typical person knows how destructive AI is to many things much less effects on local communities where they put data centers.

      • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.worldEnglish
        76·
        2 months ago

        That’s a pretty reductive take. I consider auto-formatting a form of AI because that’s a function that I ask ChatGPT to do. “Reformat the code” “tidy it up.” But I’m assuming even that is bad to you because ChatGPT was involved. The level of “AI” that the Claire devs used seemed to be on the same level as what I just described. A tool to help get the ball moving but not be the sole engine of the project.

        Also, you don’t need to use LLMs from companies like OpenAI or Google, you can just run your own LLM.

        • The_Decryptor@aussie.zoneEnglish
          32·
          2 months ago

          But I’m assuming even that is bad to you because ChatGPT was involved.

          I think it’s bad because it’s a waste of power, unreliable, and would be much slower than an actual deterministic code formatters that already exist.

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          45·
          2 months ago

          We’ve seen this before with horse armor and gambling in video games. If you allow a little they are going to take a mile with it. That point I don’t consider it art anymore. AI is not art.