• Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty interesting. How come they can get 1000c in space but not on earth? Doesnt the vacuum of space make it hard to retain heat?

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Vacuum is a perfect thermal insulator. The only real losses are radiative.

      Edit: From Stefan-Boltzmann: up to (not sure about emissivities, but could be down to 10% of this) 100kW for a black body of 1m diameter at 1000C.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m completely unaware of the science around it all but none the less its exciting stuff, i hope to read more about it as things progress.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Heat is so easily retained in space that when the Shuttle launched they only had 4 hours to open the cargo doors to expose the radiators or the cabin and electronics would overheat and they would have to scrub the mission. They never had to scrub for that reason though.

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      The article doesn’t state they can’t reach that temperature down on earth, and many processes do. It’s really not the jist of the article. Space manufacturing is interesting for the micro-gravity and better vacuum/less contamination. .