• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    And yet he still charges 30% to list on steam…

    He could move it all to a non profit like blender and charge creators a reasonable price if he cared about the industry or players.

    He’s just as profit minded as any billionaire. He’s just using Linux contributions to solidify their monopoly on pc gaming.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t disagree with the 30% being too much. That said, Steam often provides more than just a sales pages for the fee, they always provide server access for multiplayer and cloud saving. That has to get covered somehow. I also believe in celebrating the good things going and there really aren’t many of those in the gaming market these days, certainly not in the AAA-money tier. I’m going to enjoy the wins we get. If you don’t want to do that, enjoy being miserable, I guess.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        More entrenching of their services as a monopoly. Without a doubt the cost of a sales page and servers would be less than 30% of a lot of games sales. It’s a cost they are willing to pay if it means keeping their walled garden and 30% flat rate. (Like Sony selling consoles at a loss)

        Any open source Linux contributions from steam (proton) are welcome because it’s not tied into their monopoly and people can use them freely.

        You can enjoy the small victories while also being aware of future outcomes from these corporate giants.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah their monopoly already has fucked the whole gaming industry to the point of there being virtual no competition.

        That fucking toxic shit needs to burn with the rest of the corporate shitheads.

        A previously stated, eat the rich won’t make any exceptions for any oligarch let alone one running a monopoly.

          • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            lol and that excuses their monopoly and blatant anti competition tactics?

            They made their own monopoly where they saw the opportunity. Doesn’t mean we can’t do better and shouldn’t fight billionaires entrenching themselves into aspect of life.

              • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah M$ fucked up their chances at the steam monopoly. Still doesn’t mean we need it to be a monopoly at all. Going from one billionaire conglomerate to another owning the monopoly, still leaves you with a monopoly. Neither option is good, you are still stuck in a monopoly that will enshittify.

                  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Yes so now there is the operating system monopoly by the two giants and the gaming monopoly on pc with steam and the consoles being locked down ecosystems run by two corporations. None of that is good competition or a positive for creators or players.

                    It’s still a fucking monopoly we are stuck in and steam like every damn oligarch tech company needs to be chopped up.

                    Go on, lick that boot as hard as you can