Definition of can dish it but can’t take it
Classic pull up the ladder behind you move.
Kind of hilarious that one component of their complaint is that the DeepSeek model is more energy/computation efficient than theirs. Welcome to the free market?!
OpenAI: “They stole our technology!”
Also OpenAI: “Uh, well, our technology is actually inferior to theirs, but they must have stole it and made massive sweeping improvements to it that we weren’t able to! How dare they!”
How dare you steal our technology! We stole it first!
Oh no!
OpenAI should copywrite their work. I’m sure no one would dare steal someone else’s hard work for their AI model development!
Ain’t no copyright in an AI world
But it’s Open AI ?
“We do not steal inferior technology.”
It steals from everyone, but if it’s from itself, it’s too much.
Can dish what? They haven’t made a profitable product ever. If you had a lemonade stand you are more profitable than those fucks.
Big “I’m telling Mom” energy.
Scrapers getting mad for being scraped will never not be funny for me. Deepseek surgence is such an awesome story.
old (1 year = 1000 years in AI) accusation not relevant to expected upcoming deepseek breakthrough model. Distillation is used to make smaller models, and they are always crap compared to training on open data. Distillation is not a common technique anymore, though it’s hard to prove that more tokens wouldn’t be “cheat code”
This is more a desperation play from US models, even as youtube is in full, “buy $200/month subscriptions now or die” mode.
DeepSeek API isn’t free, and to use Qwen you’d have to sign up for Ollama Cloud or something like that, as Local deploying is prohibitive.
They’re trying to link DeepSeek to the old tale freeride companies that apparently have ties to the original company product and gets a “look the other way” attitude from it (e.g. Meta with their Whatsapp products). This situation is nothing like it.
