The only passenger in the car when an American citizen was shot and killed by a federal officer in South Texas last year had planned to speak up and contradict the government’s account of the shooting. However, the passenger, Joshua Orta, died in an unrelated car crash over the weekend.
While the AI arms race is an unmitigated disaster for the personal computer and consumer electronics sphere (and the environment no less), on the small plus side, we might see fallout resulting in less digitization of vehicles and a return to some computer electronics such as televisions back to “dumb” models with no extra features other than being a television due to the shortage of memory and storage. They can’t just dip on producing things like TVs and cars forever (they’re already planning on short-term production reductions) while waiting for RAM and storage to become freely available again.
Thats a good point. I really hope you’re right. Seems impossible to buy a new car these days if you’re at all privacy conscious
1: Buy whatever car you want.
2: Find the antenna it uses to communicate.
3: Cut or unplug that antenna wire.
4: Attempt to use some online feature of the car and confirm that it worked when you see ‘Failed: no signal’.
If you’re not technically savvy enough to do that yourself, I’m sure you can find 3rd party mechanics who are willing to do it for a reasonable price.
The car will then forever function in ‘outside of signal range’ mode without being able to connect to the internet or any other network. Some features might be unavailable in this mode, but all the important features of the car should still work. (Because manufacturers build cars to still work even when inside a tunnel or outside of cell signal range.)
It really is that simple. If your car can’t communicate with the outside world, it can’t violate your privacy (and it can’t be remotely controlled, either).
(Okay, so there are still some privacy concerns. Mainly about data logging and retaining data you’d rather not retain. But bad actors will need physical access to your car to get at that data. Only a concern if your car gets physically searched/seized.)
See, this is a cute IDEA I see around lemmy a lot, but a number of cars will see issues related to this. For example, subaru has some vehicles that will kill their own batteries trying to connect, and failing, to services that no longer exist, even while parked. Cutting your connection will prompt the same issue. Is that terrible design? Yes. But it’s also the design used for cars made to spy on you and stop working when they can’t spy on you, that don’t mind forcing you to buy a new car if you disable their spying capabilities.
Interesting advice. Thanks!
I hope I’m right, too. We need at least some positives to come out the AI shitshow.
You can and should get non-smart TVs and projectors: Look up commercial displays (absolutely worth the extra cost).
Of course. My point is that we might see a return of these kind of devices to the consumer market if they can’t afford to build smart-televisions to drop on the consumer market.
Keep buying them and they’ll probably keep making them.
I haven’t bought a new TV since 2010 and it wasn’t a smart TV.
Since then I have only bought monitors.
My car was built in 1999 because I am poor. I try to ride my bike or walk as much as possible to put fewer miles on my old shitbox car plus for the environment and less traffic yadda yadda.
Fuck me go be a contrarian jerk elsewhere please. I’m obviously not part of the problem here.
Weird response, but OK!
Weirder than responding to someone who obviously understands the issue to stop buying them?
Weirder than ignoring the entire original point which is that they won’t have the ability to make new ones because of parts shortages, and to keep making them they’ll have to resort to making models that don’t include those features?
Yeah, OK.
OK, good chat