Valnao@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulationswww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up1480arrow-down121
arrow-up1459arrow-down1external-linkAIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulationswww.newscientist.comValnao@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square77linkfedilink
minus-squareEarthman_Jim@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前The electromagnetic pulse caused by a nuke would pop resisters too. AI would more likely use biological means to get rid of us.
minus-squareSocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 个月前Assuming AI would care about itself and not just “solving the problem”.
minus-squareEarthman_Jim@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Yeah, these doom scenarios require cascading assumptions and no real answer, except maybe “don’t”.
minus-squareNihilsineNefas@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前Like heating the planet another degree and starving us out of existence by killing off biodiversity until the crops die out… Like they’re doing now? (I say “Us” when I just really mean the 99% of people that haven’t got self sufficient underground complexes)
The electromagnetic pulse caused by a nuke would pop resisters too. AI would more likely use biological means to get rid of us.
Assuming AI would care about itself and not just “solving the problem”.
Yeah, these doom scenarios require cascading assumptions and no real answer, except maybe “don’t”.
Like heating the planet another degree and starving us out of existence by killing off biodiversity until the crops die out… Like they’re doing now?
(I say “Us” when I just really mean the 99% of people that haven’t got self sufficient underground complexes)