• Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 days ago

          Exactly, even just how loud the internets are gonna be about the DP can make them, or other manufacturers, implement DP into cheaper/all models … the tech itself doesn’t cost much & the signal isn’t that different to process compared to HDMI).

          And ofc to the back of the TV.

      • blueduck@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        78
        ·
        19 days ago

        Proprietary standard that’s worse than modern DisplayPort specs. Adds cost without adding features.

      • just2look@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        It is a proprietary closed protocol with built in DRM. The HDMI Forum is not consumer friendly, charges royalties to manufacturers for the productiom of HDMI capable devices, and HDMI has no performance advantage over Display Port.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        19 days ago

        The connector is flimsy, will wear out in applications where you connect and disconnect it often and the whole standard is controlled by big tech and they abuse that power to hinder open source efforts.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 days ago

        Enemy of your freedom. Doesn’t even let AMD support 2.1 on Linux so Steam Deck or Steam Machine cannot support 2.1 with open source drivers! That’s why it’s officially only HDMI 2.0