- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
Woah! We better keep this quiet! Only me, you, and theverge.com have any idea this is happening! What a secret!
To be fair, I’m sure I’ll forget about this in less than an hour. Secret will be safe with me.
“Your secret is safe with my indifference” - Taliesin Jaffe
If true, this is the most stereotypical Chinese company move ever.
Link without paywall https://archive.is/lNhFY
90% of datasets are created with chatgpt, this is nothing new or a faux pas like is implied in the article. It is against the terms of service but it’s also largely considered unenforceable. Openai can ban your account for it I guess (they never do) but they can’t sue over this or anything of the sort.
Secretly using an API endpoint?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
TikTok’s entrancing “For You” feed made its parent company, ByteDance, an AI leader on the world stage.
But that same company is now so behind in the generative AI race that it has been secretly using OpenAI’s technology to develop its own competing large language model, or LLM.
This practice is generally considered a faux pas in the AI world.
It’s also in direct violation of OpenAI’s terms of service, which state that its model output can’t be used “to develop any artificial intelligence models that compete with our products and services.” Microsoft, which ByteDance is buying its OpenAI access through, has the same policy.
Nevertheless, internal ByteDance documents shared with me confirm that the OpenAI API has been relied on to develop its foundational LLM, codenamed Project Seed, during nearly every phase of development, including for training and evaluating the model.
Employees involved are well aware of the implications; I’ve seen conversations on Lark, ByteDance’s internal communication platform for employees, about how to “whitewash” the evidence through “data desensitization.” The misuse is so rampant that Project Seed employees regularly hit their max allowance for API access.
The original article contains 187 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!