I took a lot of photos with a lot of people during the late 90’s. I wonder if those backup CDs in storage are still good.
Nah these were still king of the pron. Blanks in a shoebox under a bed. Some wild jungle shit on them that made you understand why you are a mixed baby. It wasn’t your parents on the tape. It’s just what daddy liked.
That’s cable/rental porn backup though. Definitely not internet porn backup.
My boomer parents weren’t using the internet for porn.
I taught my dad how to find porn on the internet in the early 2000s.
Before that, though, he had two VCRs and a black box between them that let him copy rented porn tapes. He had a collection of 75 to 100 by the time he quit.
Those do not look like VHS cassettes
I never heard any one call those cassettes. Everyone I know just called then tapes. But your usage is correct according to Wikipedia.
I always figured cassettes were small.
Video Cassette Recorder, VCR.
As opposed to reel-to-reel video recorders:
Kind of cool that as storage media on tape shrunk in physical size and grew in data storage the term cassette started to change use in shorthand parlance.
It’s a generic term but yeah to everyone nowadays a cassette would be one of these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassette_tape
That wiki article has more examples in it of older ones too and competitors if you feel like a little random reading.
That’s what I think of when I hear cassette. Thanks for the link!
Cassette just means a small case, compact enough that you can plug the entire case straight into your machine. A “normal” sized case would be one of those metal canisters that store 8mm movie reels, and you need to take the tape out of those to use them.
Assuming that as an older millennial, I’m the parent you’re talking about, no. Porn almost never went on those. VHS and paper magazines mostly. Computer porn would be downloaded to a convoluted folder depth with misleading names on your hard drive, and would never be placed on removable media unless you had a CD burner, which was rare as fuck (but they did exist).
Seriously though, people used to make genuine mazes out of nested folders.
If you were in the era of dial up BBS systems, you still were far more likely to use a hard drive than a floppy. The reason floppies weren’t used is that even at low resolution with still images, not much would fit on the things, super inconvenient. Shareware, sure. Porn? Not likely.
I can confirm the existance of said mazes of nested folders. Also renaming files to have the wrong extension for the file type, to prevent anyone else from finding them.
Windows sold me out by having a “Recently viewed files” section on the start menu that I had not noticed. Luckily, it was my friends that found it and not my parents.
Still, though, being caught red-handed with badly photoshopped fake nudes of Britney Spears was quite embarrassing for teenage me.
I discovered Slackware Linux at the age of 15, which kinda raised the bar for unexpected entry to my collection. But it also prevented myself from perusing it, as I couldn’t get a proper image viewer to work for the first couple of weeks… :-)
Back before searching for files was built into the file explorer in Windows, I created a folder scheme where each directory had 10 subfolders named 0-9. You needed the “pin” to find the right one. It was good for maybe 4 deep? before it the folder creation script fell apart.
Disclaimer: this was so long ago, and this post triggered the memory, so I honestly can’t remember if this was just an idea I had that didn’t work, or if it was a real thing I managed to pull off with some basic batch scripting. Either way though, the folder decoy thing was real.
If you were a real pervert like me you needed zip disks
Because floppies held like 4 low res images?
I didn’t even know of the existence of those! Thanks for the new knowledge, I guess they never really took off much?
They were moderately popular around the turn of the century. They held 100-250MB but were pretty fragile. There were others called Jaz disks that held 1GB.
But once you could burn a CD or use a thumb drive they weren’t worth the risk of data loss.
deleted by creator
Millennial lies!
Porn in the 90’s, that was not in print, was stored on tape. By the mid 90:s the most tech savvy of us saved porn on a “zip disk” which were also primarily tape drives.
were also primarily tape drives.
?
no. zip disks were a shitty removable format that ran off parallel (slowly) or scsi (paying more), or eventually atapi/ide and usb iirc.
iomega also made tape drives, but zip disks weren’t it.
I wonder if it only took until the 1920s for people to say “back in the 1800s” in order to anger the old people
It angers old people because of the poor grammar and bad maths habits, not because children are implying they’re old.
That’s such a widely accepted and familiar way of expressing this that I can’t even see the poor and bad parts. What do you mean?
used to burn snes roms on these
No, that was my porn collection. And yes i lost a lot of it.
Oh sure yeah in 1906 people had porno jpegs on floppies, only problem was they didn’t have the technology to access them 😅
Floppies are particularly vulnerable to decay from my understanding.
I found a box of 8-12 disks a few years ago and exactly none of them were readable. That’s probably bad luck but…
It’s unfortunately the same case for Tapes and VCRs, those thin plates and strips can be wiped by a reasonably stout magnet
Progressive JPEGs.
Nah, it usually was tapes and magazines.
Hmmm sweet 16 colors 320x200 jpg.
Screw you, buddy. It took me 3-years to download those 20-disks of porn and I’ll be god damned if I allow my efforts to be besmirched by the likes of you!
Your parents in 640x480 glory.
What, you have porn in 4k?
… what for?
