• Trudge [Comrade]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In May, a court rejected Lai’s bid to halt his security trial on grounds that it was being heard by judges picked by Hong Kong’s leader. That is a departure from the common law tradition China promised to preserve for 50 years after the former British colony returned to China in 1997.

    Don’t tell me that British laws are actually that corrupt. No way, right?

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are misunderstanding what it means. The article specifically about this explains it better:

      When Hong Kong returned to China in 1997, it was promised that trials by jury, previously practiced in the former British colony, would be maintained under the city’s constitution. But in a departure from the city’s common law tradition, the security law allows no-jury trials for national security cases.