With a ~40 billion usd hole (netloss) Openai keeps it´s word by staying a nonprofit company 🤣

    • Trilogic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      26 days ago

      Idk the source of that data but OMG look at anthropic, 6.5b revenue but recently “evaluated” ~1 trillion USD. Is that for real?

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      26 days ago

      Ahahahahaha Facebook has dumped roughly the same amount of money into AI as Microsoft, but makes 1/10th the revenue. Pure gold

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      That page makes it look even better than it is. It’s almost halfway to profitable, according to that. About 2/3 of that revenue is from Nvidia though, which is just selling the shovels for the gold rush speculation. It’s not “AI profit” as if AI is producing something. It’s just sales caused by people hoping it’ll produce something in the future.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        That’s why you can click on “Hide infrastructure”, it then shows only $135B in revenue (for $1.2T spent).

  • Chahk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    25 days ago

    OpenAI is the definition of the difference between “Not-For-Profit” and “For not-profit”.

  • Jayjader@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    25 days ago

    I find it interesting that according to these numbers, if they entirely stopped R&D and marketing, they would just about break even.

    • BlueBockser@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      That’s what they want you to think. This chart is especially egregious with calling it “cost of revenue” as if the other costs weren’t just as necessary for their revenue. If they stop R&D in 2027, they won’t have any revenue by 2028 because their models will be outdated and nobody will want to use them. R&D is simply cost of doing business.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    This misapprehends the business models of techno feudalism: you operate at a loss, running on VC money which is fairly endless. You offer a freeish service to grow your brand. Then when you list on the stock exchange you live off debts loaned to you by the bank on the basis that your company is worth millions or billions.

    I have no doubt ChatGPT is, and that Sam Altman lives with no taxable income to speak of. He’s just accumulating bank loans and paying them back with other bank loans secured by OpenAIs growing stock price and company valuation.

    Money isn’t real to the elite classes. Actually I believe Stalin and Churchill once stopped at a Cafe sometime after WW2, they realised after their meal no one travelling with them had money on them to pay. Because they didn’t need money. It’s accepted when you’re at that level. Welfare Capitalism has existed for a very very long time.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    25 days ago

    Which column is infrastructure under? Things like power, DC rent, etc. Also what about depreciation assuming you try to shove all that shit (well the hardware anyway) into CapEx?

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      25 days ago

      Which column is infrastructure under?

      I don’t think they have any of that. They rent computation capacity, which should partially be under cost of revenue and partially under R&D.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    As real as any valuation. Which is to say, what investors are willing to pay for a piece of a company may not always have the most firm association with the reality of a company’s current state. And, the market can stay irrational much longer than you expect.

    • eudaemon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Accounting equivalent of “Cost of Goods Sold” but for software and tech companies its usually a service so “cost of revenue” is the term used

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Those techies might be able to create widgets but they’re sure not competent businesspersons.

  • majster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    They’ll be profitable when the training stops/slows down. But how much revenue they can generate is another question. This might be the reason behind the news of US gov thinking about banning Deepsek and other Chinese models. Open weights models kill the API billing bussiness model. Margins in that scenario probably wouldn’t cover the massive investment.