If Christianity is man made, why does everything about it go against man’s desires? Does Christianity go against man’s desires? If so, is that evidence for Christianity? I answer this question, discussing the history of Christianity, the cognitive science of religion, Buddhism, Jainism, Islam, and more.

The whole “atheists can’t answer this question” and “atheists can’t explain this” thing is really getting old.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Religion has definitely been coopted for control, but the 10 commandments, and most of Jesus teachings are not really controversial or controlling (The arent progressive in todays terms, but for their time I think they are very reasonable).

    The layers of bullshit that has been built on top certainly is controlling.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The whole adultery thing isn’t controlling?

      Marriage required recognition by a priest. All sex must happen inside the union if a marriage.

      They were literally controlling who had kids with whom.

      The whole theft thing protected the rich way more than it did the poor.

      The “worship none one beside me” was also about keeping people from leaving.

      Murder was about maintaining stability. Remember, murder is the unjustified killing of another. Who do you think was better at justifying it with a little bribe?

      But all of that is besides the point that religion vastly predates the Ten Commandments. The only reason that they’re not “progressive” was because as a basic moral code, they’ve been around longer than Moses.

      Oh, and forget the whole store of the exile from Egypt and stuff. That’s all justification for genociding their neighbors.

      Moving beyond the 10 commandments which are far from the only religious law… ancient Judaism was extremely controlling. Off the top of my head:

      • men had to get part of their dick removed
      • women had to wear long hair, but cover it
      • you could only eat certain foods, at certain times, with certain people
      • micromanaging rest days to the extreme.
      • the kind of fabrics your clothes were made from

      There’s a lot more there. And there’s a reason for that. By making it so restrictive, and threatening eternal damnation, it ensures people do what you tell them to do, and there’s plenty of people that- as ardent believers- are terrified and will do all kinds of stupid shit to stay in god’s good graces.

    • HopingForBetter@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I am concerned you don’t know the 10 commandments if you think they’re not controversial or controlling.

      To name a few most forgotten:

      Honor the sabbath day. Only worship yhwh. Don’t make any idols. Don’t take yhwv’s name in vain. And a lesser thought-crime: Don’t covet.

      Sure, the rest are societally beneficial. But these that are often forgotten are about control and nothing else.

      Edit: It’s hardly ever brought up that monotheism in Judaism wasn’t a thing until much later. So, again, these forgotten rules are about controlling who and even how to worship.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fair, those three arent the best, but they are also open to interpretation. Honor the sabbath doesnt have to mean hide in a cave all day, could just be treated as take some time to rest. One god, the lords name and idols dont really impact anyone (as most.christians dont follow it anyway, and most athiests dont care either)

        And while those may cause a minor impact to someones life, its nothing compared to the control being exerted via abortion bans and other modern religeous bullshit.

        • HopingForBetter@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It seems like you’re just being passive to avoid addressing the fact that these are extremely restrictive.

          There is no doubt that the 10 commandments are exclusionary and intended to place any followers under the control of local religious authority.

          This is like saying “Oh, we just pick and choose what to follow.”

          So, if that’s the case, what’s the point of following any of it? Jesus’ words were very specific on that part. “I come not to abolish the law, but to fulfill the law and the prophets.”

          It’s not a pick and choose kind of religion, even the christian-addendum.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That may be your interpretation, but its not mine. I am not christian and have no trouble following them, because they are so general and open to interpretation.

            It’s not a pick and choose kind of religion, even the christian-addendum.

            And yet there are hundreds of denominations that do exactly pick and choose. It seems you are the one insisting that you cannot pick and choose. (And obviously church leaders would prefer you dont pick and choose, but usually they do as well).

            The overall vibe from my Christian religious education was that as long as you are striving to be a good person, you have a place in Heaven. To err is human, and Jesus died on the cross to absolve mankind of their sins. This made atheism an obvious choice, because I do strive to be a good person, so no need to go to church and have someone else tell me what to do.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              So… do you wear clothes made of blended fibers? That’s against scripture.

              Do you turn on lights on Saturday/friday night? That’s working on the sabbath,

              Are you a man who shaves? A woman who wears short hair?

              Perhaps you have a tat?

              All against scripture. And unequivocally so.

              • CameronDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                If your gonna take the rules listed in the bible strictly, then sure. But your definition of Christian values is then far more strict than almost everyone elses interpretation, that its basically a “no true scotsman” kinda deal.

                If you want to insist that the only true Christian is someone who follows scripture verbatim and never strays, fine, they are super controlled and oppressed.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  “No true Scotsman” kind of how religion goes, yes? It’s why the Protestants fought the Catholics, the Catholics fought the Orthodox … and everyone else and everyone fought the Muslims.

                  There are always varying degrees of adherence, and this is also true of every religion that exists. You or any other believer might find particular rules absurd, and that is their business, but I’m willing to bet if you look at any single congregation, they’re going to have rules prescribing behavior in strange ways.

                  The Amish, for example. Or drinking alcohol. Or wearing certain types of clothes and wearing hair a certain way.

                  Not talking with members of the opposite sex is another common one.

                  mainstream Christianity (Orthodox, Catholic and Evangelical alike) are all apposed to abortion.

                  Social control.
                  Just because the specifics change over time doesn’t mean it’s not there. In fact it’s there to such a degree that Christians in the US are trying to exert it on everyone- abortion, laws about who can marry whom. Porn consumption. Subject matter in libraries… video games…

                  All of it is social control. And they do not like being told to fuck off.

                  • CameronDev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I’m not a believer, at all. I went to a Christian school for an education, and that was all. Neither of my parents were religious, and my Christian grandma married my Muslim grandfather. I am very much comfortably on the outside looking in here.

                    I’m not disputing that churches themselves are not based around social control, only that the core values as they were expressed to me are not that controlling.

                    To grossly simplify, if Jesus had just said “Be nice to each other”, most of us wouldn’t consider that overtly controlling. When a church later extrapolates that to “Every egg is life, killing life isnt nice, abortion is banned”, thats when it becomes control.

                    If you think that its impossible to seperate the church structures from the core beliefs, thats perfectly reasonable. The evidence is firmly in your favour. I am well aware of the bullshit being pushed by these “churches” in the US, and we have the exact same issues in Australia.

                    Anyway, thanks for you comments, i think we have both made our points, I wont waste any more of your time.