More specifically, are we seeing companies breached due to their (obvious?) security flaws, hackers getting better at what they do, or a combination of both?

What is the future of security for these large companies that we put our trust into that our data is safe?

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Most of the time it’s not even nefarious, I can tell you’ve worked big corpos. There just are too many intertwined things and no one overseeing the whole system. Every large company probably has hundreds of security flaws, but no one can see the giant entrance sign to the forest when all they can see are trees

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, I would say it absolutely is possible, but it costs money directly, up front and in an accountable manner. Security incidents vanish in the fog of responsibility diffusion and nobody specifically can be blamed. That means for each individual responsible party, it is the rational choice to do just enough not to be blamed, pull off theater to seem engaged, but avoid anything that would actually cost money.

      So, you’re kind of right, but for the wrong reasons. It’s a systemic issue, that almost inevitably happens in large organizations, but at the root is not inherent complexity, but a perverse incentive structure.

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean its at least tiptoeing the line between ignorance and malice, with decades of ignorance is starting to be indistinguishable from malice