While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys’ opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, the 3.5mm jack is more durable than USB-C (since it is rotationally symmetric twisting doesn’t apply force to the connector), it maintains compatibility with billions of audio devices and doesn’t block your charging port if you use it.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        3.5 jack port is definitely not more durable than USB-C. If you have good headphones, the change that the 3.5 plug is gigantic in length and the cable thicc AF which causes a lot of stress in the plug due to very large leverage. Additionally, I prefer to use the DAC integrated in my headphones rather than using the low quality tiny DAC in my phone. And in digital, the cable thickness does not matter really.

        • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Very few people are plugging their large headphones into their phones though. For a more reasonable pair of portable headphones or IEMs the size of the plug isn’t a problem.

          But congratulations, you have hit on my biggest audio pet peeve! DACs matter very little these days. Anything talking about DACs and not the DAC/Amp stages is marketing BS. Even dirt cheap DAC chips will acoustically transparently convert the digital signal to analog in audio frequencies because it is so basic to do. DACs on their own are useless for audio anyway, what really matters in your audio signal is the amp circuitry after the DAC that applies gain to the signal to useful levels as the choices there do make an acoustic difference if the design is poor.

          What makes you think the DAC/Amp in your headphones is going to be better than the one that is built into the SoC of your phone? I don’t think I’ve ever seen any measurements of headphone DAC/Amps.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I learned that from my father, who mostly listen to music from his phone using external headphone amp for his bayer dynamics studio headphones, or uses digital out (via Bluetooth) and let his other Bayern dynamics active headphones do the DAC. He is sure that he hears the difference, but of course that could all be in his head alone. I myself am not a hiFi enthusiast, I only find the tech behind it very interesting. (I listen to music using airPods and in my car using CarPlay, sorry iPhone user here, but thinking to migrate as soon as my iPhone X becomes unusable) But given my interest in tech, I appreciate the explanation, that cheap DAC chips are very good as well, these days.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m sorry what? The 3.5mm is better because it’s rotational symmetrical?

        Thats a minor win. You rarely really need that rotation capability, and what little you need can be made up with thinner cables (which is easier with a digital signal and DACs in the headphone, which can’t be done compatibly with 3.5mm and people are dumb) The you also have to sacrifice connection friction to gain rotation, and that has tradeoffs, especially when that friction is caused by a spring-loaded conductor (which also means more friction likely means fewer insertion cycles before friction starts dropping off).

        It also really sucks at strain relief without massive dookie springs or rubber butts…and the bigger the strain relief, the more subjective it is to perpendicular force, which is really easy to do on a 3.5mm diameter cylinder of gold-plated iron/tin alloy with the fulcrum also being at the base of the cylinder.

        Other cool thing about what could be done with USB-C headphones. A lot of companies put lead weights full-sized headphones for balance or comfort (more weight makes it feel more secure). Good Modern drivers don’t need to be as heavy as they used to be. How bout instead of weights, they use lipos? Now your headphones can charge your phone (when in wired mode, hell, I’m talking about fictional mid/high-end cans, they could have Bluetooth and ANC while we’re at it since they have power), and your charger port point is essentially moot.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Begs the question why aren’t charging jacks designed like audio jacks?

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        New headphones come with lightning and USB C cable these days

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            See it positive: you don’t have to choose from many phones if you that much want a headphone jack 😄

    • Luccus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t get why you get so much downvotes, because it’s not as obvious as people make it out to be and there are plenty of adapters. So it’s a good question.

      But yes. The 3.5mm jack had the thing companies say they are striving for: simplicity.

      DACs are nice and everything but the phone can just decide to not connect properly. The DAC can decide it had enough of your phone. In either case you’d need to reconnect them. And that means unlocking your phone, because a secure phone will block streaming to ‘unknown’ USB-C devices, unless it’s unlocked during the negotiation phase. And if your connectors have become wonky for whatever reason: Well, no music for you.

      And then there’s the issue where you have to have them at hand when you need them. In your car, on your person, while at work.

      3.5mm is great because it actually “just works”. One of the few things that can claim such thing.

    • Lazz45@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, I should be able to play music, AND charge the phone without a 9 wire adapter like those universal charger plugs from 10 years ago. Wild concept. I wonder when phone tech will be able to support such a thing

    • Vardøgor@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      my issue right now is that i use one of those charging + 3.5mm splitters in the car, but when they’re both connected there’s a loud ass buzz. a 3.5mm ground loop isolator works but made bass sound terrible. i’m probably gonna get an old phone just for music in the car 🤦🏽‍♂️

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just get a new car pleb.

        Honestly Bluetooth in a car has been a must for me for like 10 years now. And having experienced CarPlay, that’s def next (especially for cars that support wireless and have a Qi spot. Thats practically magic)

        • Vardøgor@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          i like my car :( and i’m paranoid about features in new cars. i can hear a noticeable difference in quality with bluetooth vs wired too. never been a fan

          regardless, cars that people primarily use 3.5mm for aren’t going away too soon!

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I upgraded my car without Bluetooth using a carPlay ready touchscreen auto radio to replace the old thing that was mounted in the DIN drawer thingy

          • jasondj@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You should do what I did and just fuck up your ears with loud car stereos in your teenage years. Now I can’t tell a damn bit of difference.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        In car, I can recommend using android in the car using the touchscreen of the car. There you can manage audio as well as charging the phone. One cable to rule them all.