• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I understand. Collective Ownership entails collective management of Capital based on agreed-upon rules. It does not mean nobody owns anything.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s not an answer. That’s just restating the name of your position.

          Here’s an example: suppose I buy a bunch of woodworking tools and put them in my garage. I now have a woodworking shop which I can use to make and sell furniture. Is that capital? Am I required to surrender my garage to the authorities?

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Depends on what is democratically decided as the rule. The idea of buying a bunch of woodworking tools for the purpose of selling furniture is probably off the table (haha).

            Why would you want to?

            • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Because woodworking is a fun hobby that you can turn into a business. Because I value craftsmanship and attention to detail over mass-produced furniture. Because I believe in independent artisans, apprenticeships, and the sharing of knowledge.

              If you are in favour of a world where this is not possible then I want no part of that. That sounds like a horrific dystopia!

              I also believe you put far too much faith in democracy. Look at the democracies we have around the world today. Sure, they are not as bad as the totalitarian states but they are far from perfect. Democracies are also struggling from a crisis of faith in institutions. How are you going to build a collective society when everyone has lost faith in institutions?

                • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You make it a business to support yourself and your family. Otherwise you won’t have much time to devote to it and you won’t be as good as it.

                  Anyway, how are you going to get anyone in a democracy to vote away their own property rights? The Soviets certainly did not achieve that. They used violent revolution to achieve their ends. We all saw how that ended up. The most stalwart opponents of Marxism today are those who knew what it was like to live in the Soviet Union. A system where hard work is devalued and freeloading predominates.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Why would you make more money working by yourself, rather than at a job? Why can’t you have a job and a hobby? Why would you be worried about providing for your family with robust safety nets?

                    Getting the workers to want to share ownership isn’t veru hard, the ones with pushback are the minority that makes up exploitative owners.