shamelessly stolen from nixCraft on mastodon

    • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually did this once. My USB was on /dev/sda instead of sdb and I didn’t bother to check. It took me like 2 days to fix it because you can’t just delete partitions and start over normally, it changes some flags on your drive that you need to manually reset for them to be usable again. Fun times.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disk Duplicator is a destroyer? Man, I used to image so many drives with DD back in my helpdesk days…

      • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        dd does not stand for “disk duplicator”. That’s a modern backronymization that doesn’t reflect the original general usage of the command which is to “convert and copy”. Efficiently (with respect to I/O) copying raw data is only one of its intended purposes; it also converts text encodings.

  • foyrkopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone who hits enter on a dd command without triple-checking it gets exactly what they deserve.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just make use of my paranoia, so I triple and quadruple check. Then get a coffee and quadruple check again. Never messed up once

    • bzLem0n@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s even easier to prevent confusion if you use /dev/disk/by-id/ id’s, it only took a few times of overwriting the wrong disk to figure that out.

        • Nithanim@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure if it is equal on all distros but on every one I have used it’s a readable string of muliple components. One of them is “usb” for a usb mass storage, so if it is the only one you have connected to your computer it is very obvious. For like sata disks it has the manufacturer and serial on it so you can match what drive it is you want to write to. Also, the name is pretty unique (on your sysytem at least, globally I don’t know), so even if you swap hardware around, you cannot write to the wrong storage if you got the right name. Like “sdb” can be reassigned, but the id is an id.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Except the proposed alternative should not be cp or pv, but dd bs=4M oflag=direct,sync status=progress.

      I feel like I’m taking crazy pills with all the advice in this thread, because for USB keys you will otherwise end up instantly filling the write cache… which will block the apparent progress of the copy operation (so why even use pv since all you’re doing is measuring your RAM speed and available cache size) as well as heavily slow down (even potentially partially freeze in some circumstances) the rest of your system as the kernel is running out of free pages and can’t flush caches fast enough due to the slow-ass write speeds of usb keys.

      * (Alternatively there is a kernel setting somewhere to disable caching globally for a block device… but in most cases caching is good, just not when you’re flashing an ISO).