Florida’s state athletic board fined a high school and put it on probation Tuesday after a transgender student played on the girls volleyball team, a violation of a controversial law enacted by Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Legislature.

The Florida High School Athletic Association fined Monarch High $16,500, ordered the principal and athletic director to attend rules seminars and placed the suburban Fort Lauderdale school on probation for 11 months, meaning further violations could lead to increased punishments. The association also barred the girl from participating in boys sports for 11 months.

The 2021 law, which supporters named “The Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,” bars transgender girls and women from playing on public school teams intended for student athletes identified as girls at birth.

The student, a 10th grader who played in 33 matches over the last two seasons, was removed from the team last month after the Broward County School District was notified by an anonymous tipster about her participation. Her removal led hundreds of Monarch students to walk out of class two weeks ago in protest.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    From the party that brought you such hits like: “Don’t Tread on Me,” and “Small Govermment!” comes a new this new banger:

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The highly competitive and world famous Monarch girls volleyball team from Coconut Creek, Florida. Nothing should be allowed to besmirch their timeless reputation through the hallowed halls of heteronormative athletic excellence.

    Who called it in? It was a horny dad who got the ick after ogling the trans kid at volleyball practice wasn’t it?

  • violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    According to armchair analysts, isn’t she supposed to be dominating all high school volleyball in it’s entirety like some ‘hopped up on E’ ubermensch? /s

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                I used to actually try to reason with people like you, with citations and ethical appeals – the whole nine yards.

                But you know what I learned? You can’t logic someone out of a position they didn’t logic themselves into.

                No matter what anyone says, you lot really want to use those skull calipers, and ain’t no data, logic, or ethics going to stop you.

                And yes, it’s absolutely bigoted and sexist to imply that activities should be segregated by gender. That’s objectively a bigoted opinion. You just don’t want to admit it, because it would mean you choose to be a bad person.

                Again, you won’t let something like an objective fact stop you, so far be it from me to waste my time with people like you.

                • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It’s really not a bigoted position; it’s about protecting women.

                  I should say, for some people I’m sure it’s about bigotry. But personally I think it’s an important feminist issue, since biological women could be playing alongside people that have gone through male puberty. That has the potential to be unreasonably dangerous as well as unfair to those who’ve been through female puberty, on average.

                  Remember this is about demographic averages, and it remains true that some/many biological women could annihilate some/many biological men in many physical endeavours. It’s that bimodal distribution again. Not anymore bigoted than, unfortunately, reality is.

  • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I may get down voted for this, but there needs to be a distinction between male and female athletes somewhere. There’s biological differences in muscle mass and trans women have a biological advantage. I don’t necessarily agree with fine, but I do think that cis female sports should have some protections too.

      • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is this scientifically verified? If it is, I’d like to see the study. And what is the study’s demographic? Because we’re only talking about athletics so the demo should be trans athletes vs cis female athletes.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I what way did I attack it? I asked to see the source and expressed my concern with possible points of scrutiny as it’s being presented in the argument at hand. I’m pro-LGBT rights.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Reading into this, my main points of concern are that there is only a population of 8 in each group. That’s far from clinically significant, but if we pretend for the sake of argument that it is a clinically significant population there’s still the fact that TW have more muscle mass and outperformed the CW in their handgrip strength despite lower strength/FFM due to the extra muscle mass. The study authors believe that this is because a difference in oxidative processes in the muscle but don’t go on to elaborate their hypothesis so it may allow some TW to take advantage of their extra muscle mass when in competition and other hormones flood the CNS/bloodstream.

            My hypothesis would be that adrenaline temporarily helps to overcome the suppression of muscle performance due to hormone therapy. Note that this is my hypothesis and would need to be studied. Maybe I am wrong, but in my clinical experience the observable results run counter to the small scope of this particular study.

    • Serdan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why? What do you imagine is the harm caused by allowing all women to participate?