Teddy (left), and Sampson (right)

  • WamGams@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    To be clear, people who advocate for the extermimation of all bully breeds are not claiming that pitbulls account for 99% of all attacks.

    So right out of the gate you have decided to make the point you are “debating” more extreme than the most extreme right wing nutcases already part of the conversation.

    Better luck rage baiting somebody else. Maybe start out reasonable and then ramp up the insanity slowly instead of coming out of the gate so hot next time.

    • HawtTism@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      To be clear, I said “99% of videos ever posted about someone being attacked by a dog. And nobody is surprised when it’s a pitbull.” YouTube “attacked by dog” - it’s almost always a pitbull. You misconstrued what I said, and twisted it into some crazy “right-wing” topic. You’re simply wrong.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not looking at 99% pit bull attack videos though on YouTube.

        Now, everybody has a different search results targeted directly to them by Google. If Google is only showing you pit bull attacks, it’s because they decided that is the content you are willing to engage with.

        And seeing that you create accounts to argue 8 month old comments that are defending pit bulls, it seems pretty clear that Google has assumed correctly about you.

        • HawtTism@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I just started using Lemmy. But thanks for responding to an old comment!