starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square346fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down133
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square346fedilink
minus-squareDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
To a certain point.