It’s the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.
Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are apparently the same three pages, but in a different orderdifferent pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.
So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime…
Strange. This is the result I get from Google.
It’s the same result the author of the image had before editing it with inspect element for internet points. You can see the source material on the bottom of the image, seems to match with your result.
Looks like the sources are different: In the top right of the response you can see the fav icons of the sites the AI used to get info. They are
apparently the same three pages, but in a different orderdifferent pages, and in the OP it says +5 vs +3 in the other screenshot.So it looks like they might have dropped a couple of bad sources somewhere along the way. But that doesn’t help those who already got bad answers in the meantime…
Doesn’t Google present them in order of usage in the summary?
Yeah I don’t think I’ve been able to reproduce a single one of these types of posts yet. I’ve gotten a radically different result several times though