• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This article makes my brain want to bleed.

    I’ll say it louder one last time for the people in the back:

    THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH BITS IN ANY TYPE OF NFT TO STORE ART ON THE BLOCKCHAIN. THE BEST YOU CAN DO IS A URL WEBLINK TO THE IMAGE AND AN IMAGE HASH. THAT IS FUNCTIONALLY NOT THE SAME AS STORING THE ACTUAL IMAGE ON THE BLOCKCHAIN. IF THE ORIGINAL IMAGE GETS DELETED, THE URL AND HASH ARE BOTH EFFECTIVELY USELESS.

    The art is always a completely separate entity from the NFT itself. Trying to act like this is “regulating art” is just more cryptobro bullshit.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Clearly, the answer is more blockchain. In fact, let’s blockchain the blockchain and then blockchain that blockchain to… Woo, I got carried away. What were we talking about?

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are a couple projects with native block chain art but as you might expect it’s low resolution pixel art due to the nature of block chain being prohibitively expensive to use as storage

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dude you might as well try to explain algebra to cats. When you inevitably fail then at least you can pet the cats.