• ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In this case it’s not about body shaming but about shaming a means of compensation. Also it’s not really a literal take. “Big dick energy” has nothing do with actual dick size. And being a “Karen” has nothing to with a persons actual name or gender.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure if you’re serious but i will answer as if you were.

        A common attack against people with large trucks is that they have a large truck to compensate having a small penis. This implies having a small penis is bad/unacceptable. This is obvious body shaming but also contributes to toxic masculinity.
        Both of these are unacceptable.

        There are many alternative ways to talk shit without playing into these kinds of comments and TBH, the compensation comments have been used so much and are so obviously baseless that they don’t hit very hard, IMO.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          well, i didn’t actually say that, and i’m not responsible for others filling in the blanks with their own negative thoughts. as you can see, several others actually managed to conclude something different.

          don’t blame the Rorschach test because you see something you don’t like.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Blocked. User has nothing useful to contribute and will argue in bad faith when called out.