• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Taking without giving is always viewed negatively in social settings.

    Maybe “taking advantage of” is wrong but then again, it is a dick move anyway.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I’m putting BSD or MIT license on something, I’m explicitly saying you can use it however you want, you can change it however you want, you don’t have to share back, I just ask for credit for my part in it

      It’s not taking so much as being given freely

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly this. I have a couple of small projects that are MIT licensed specifically because I don’t care how people use them or what they use them for. If someone finds it useful then they’re welcome to do whatever they want with it.

        This idea that I’m being somehow hoodwinked or taken advantage of because the thing that I explicitly said could be used freely is being used in a way that doesn’t align with the values of some other completely uninvolved third party is beyond absurd.

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think you are missing the point. I am not saying it wasn’t. But if you makes a gift for your friend’s birthday, and they don’t bother at all to return the favor/attention, would you be upset as you would think it is kinda a dick move?

    • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      With software there would be infinite copies of that free item for everyone to get. So the dick move is to sell it to people who are unaware that they could get it for free.